http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hep.25936/abstract
Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for
assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: A pilot study
.
Giovanna Ferraioli M.D.1,†,*, Carmine Tinelli M.D.2, Barbara Dal Bello M.D.3, Mabel Zicchetti M.D.1, Gaetano Filice M.D.4, Carlo Filice M.D.1, on behalf of the Liver
Fibrosis Study Group, Elisabetta Above M.D.1, Giorgio Barbarini M.D.4, Enrico Brunetti M.D.4, Willy Calderon M.D.4, Marta Di Gregorio M.D.1, Raffaella Lissandrin
M.D.4,
Serena Ludovisi4, Laura Maiocchi M.D.4, Antonello Malfitano M.D.4, Giuseppe Michelone M.D.4, Mario Mondelli M.D.4, Savino F.A. Patruno M.D.4, Alessandro F. Perretti
M.D.4,
Gianluigi Poma M.D.1, Paolo Sacchi M.D.4, Marco Zaramella M.D.4
DOI: 10.1002/hep.25936
Copyright © 2012 American Association
for the Study of Liver Diseases
Issue
Hepatology
|
Abstract
Real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) is a novel, noninvasive method
to assess liver fibrosis by measuring liver stiffness. This single center study
was conducted to assess the accuracy of SWE in patients with chronic hepatitis
C in comparison with transient elastography (TE) by using liver biopsy (LB) as
the reference standard.
Consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis C scheduled for liver biopsy
by referring physicians were studied. One hundred twenty-one patients met
inclusion criteria. On the same day real-time SWE using the ultrasound system
Aixplorer™ (SuperSonic Imagine S.A., Aix-en-Provence, France), TE using
FibroScan™ (Echosens, Paris, France) and ultrasound-assisted LB were
consecutively performed. Fibrosis was staged according to METAVIR scoring system.
Analyses of receiver operating characteristic curve were performed to calculate
optimal area under the curve (AUROC) for F0-F1 versus F2-F4, F0- F2 versus
F3-F4, and F0-F3 versus F4 for both real-time SWE and TE.
Liver stiffness values increased in parallel with the degree of liver
fibrosis both with SWE and TE. AUROCs were 0.92 (95%CI,0.85-0.96) for SWE and
0.84 (95%CI,0.76-0.90) for TE (p=0.002); 0.98(95%CI,0.94-1.00) for SWE
and 0.96 (95%CI,0.90-0.99) for TE (p=0.14); 0.98(95%CI,0.93-1.00) for
SWE and 0.96 (95%CI,0.91-0.99) for TE (p=0.48) when comparing F0-F1
versus F2- F4; F0- F2 versus F3-F4; and F0 -F3 versus F4 respectively.
Conclusion.
The results of this study show that real-time SWE is more accurate than
TE in assessing significant fibrosis (F≥2). With respect to TE, SWE has the
advantage of imaging liver stiffness in real-time, while guided by a B-mode
image. Thus, the region of measurement can be guided with both anatomical and
tissue stiffness information. (Hepatology 2012.)
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου